Vancouver delays city fireworks ban

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

The Vancouver, Canada City Council Thursday deferred for two weeks a decision on a motion to ban the sale of fireworks.

Staff are to report by then on how fireworks are licensed elsewhere for family use and whether the city has the legal power to ban their sale.

In 2005, there were 34 fireworks-related fires that did $7,500 in damage. In 2007, there were 40 fires and $79,700 damage, including two vehicles, seven structures and blazes in dumpsters, port-a-potties and trees.

Thursday's motion would have banned all sales of fireworks except to licensed users putting on community displays.

The delay came after a list of speakers, some of them doctors, painted grim pictures of injuries suffered by children who had underestimated the power of Halloween explosives -- one burned while trying to determine why a device failed to explode -- or who had been watching from a distance their parents had assumed was safe.

In one case, a child was burnt when a rocket took a wandering route and flew up her sweater as her father held her.

The arguments appeared to move NPA councillors but not the opposition, who insisted a full ban would punish families and ethnic communities who use fireworks responsibly.

Add to:    Add to your del.icio.us del.icio.us   |    Digg this story  Digg   |    Add to Newsvine Newsvine   |    Stumble It! StumbleUpon

Comments (2 posted):

Barry Wah Lee on February 28, 2008 8:40 AM
avatar
Ummm sounds like some people have been getting fireworks from factories that are not so good.Also it seems like people just need to learn about the power and amazing nature of fireworks and other things out there.Too much TV,indoors activities,or molly coddling again?
Also with an underground antipathy towards so called dangerous things,then they do not get talked about,nor taught about.
Jon David on February 29, 2008 12:32 PM
avatar
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/A-Z_Injury_Topics.htm
Here is a link for the CDC in the us.
I guess if you wanted to make a case to ban something because of potential risk here is a good start.I would start with pools,lakes,rivers,ponds and bath tubs THEY ARE VERY VERY DANGEROUS and death occurs when people enter water.
play grounds are a place I would not send my 7 year old to just look at the injury rate there.
we all assume certain risk in life by driving a car or allowing a highly flamable gas to have access to our homes for heat and cooking not to mention the potential for odorless carbon monoxide.
if you are going to set terms of use then get a consensus and pas it but dont sit there and bring in the one sided story to the table..that is shameful.
Glade I wont be traveling to vancouver anytime soon they might regulate at what time of day I can drive my car or go swimming.

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Rate this article
0